Discourse No. 3: “Racial and Religious Interolerance in texas prisons” (Thunderhorse Vs. Pierce, et. al., litigation in progress).
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits governmental intrusion into the FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION. It also forbids governments from the ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION . This excludes favoritism, and treating and religious faith differently. A State must remain neutral to all religion.
In 1978 I came to TDC with a TRO (Temporary Restraining order) signed by the Honorable Wm. Ralph Elliot of Grayson Co, TX restraining TDC from cutting my hair due to religious reasons. AIRFA (American Indian Religious Freedom Act) had just been enacted in September of that year.
When I arrived at the TDC Diagnostic Unit, however, the TRO was torn up, I was beaten with axe-handles and bats and subdued by building tenders per ORDERS of Asst. Warden Billy Ware. My head was shaved bald. I was placed in lock-up. I tried to APPEAL but Major Lannie Steele of Ellis I Unit intercepted all my outgoing legal mail and destroyed them. I kept carbon copies and later when I left on a bench-warrant I contacted outside lawyers.
Thus began a war between myself and Texas prison officials that continues to this day. In the past 30 years I have participated in several legal actions (two of which were assigned to the ACLU of Texas) based on religious freedom. As a result, TDC entered into three out-of-court agreements with me (1985, 1989, 1995) which resulted in a number of accommodations to my religious faith.
I was the first person in TDC to be allowed to have a recognized Native American Spiritual Circle, to wear my hair long and in braids, and to have my own medicine bag and my own personal ceremonial pipe. Jolene Yellow Quill was also the only female prisoner in TDC recognized to have similar access.
Even during the periods when I was assigned to administrative segregation a volunteer chaplain would bring a box full of items with my sacred pipe to me every Friday so I could conduct my spiritual obligations to my Clan and my nation.
In the past five years TDJC has initiated the finalization of the RUIZ litigations and immediately reversed itself on these religious accommodations. They now only allow a sacred pope in group worship and only after a person passes a written test. No other faith in prison has this requirement nor is it part of any requirement for any faith outside in the free world. If the test is passed then a person is eligible to go to one of the TDC’s 13 designated units that allow Native American Worship.
The TDC policy for the Native American Religion says that powwows are not an event that can be accommodated in person, and that we have no dietary requirements and other misrepresentations of our religious traditions. So, on 10-25-2004 I filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division. It is styled: IRON THUNDERHORSE VS. BILL PIERCE, et. al., Cause No. 9:04-CV-222. Judith K. Guthrie, U.S. Magistrate Judge was assigned to the case.
The COMPLAINT was brought under the religious Land Use and Institutionalized Person Act (RLUIPA) 42 U.S.C. § 200cc-3. It alleges that a number of substantial burdens had been placed against my religious free exercise by pressuring and coercing me into abandoning my faith as a substitute Christianized and sanitized version created by TDC of our religion. I also challenged TDC’s antiquated Grooming Policies by failing to provide an adequate religious exemption and for arbitrary enforcement of the standards against long hair and neglecting sanitation, health, etc.
My wife and I conducted an On-Line survey of all state prisons. Thirty-eight prisons from across America and the Federal BOP responded. Only four states in addition to TDC have grooming codes that do not allow either freedom in grooming or a religious exemption. We wrote a report and attached these email responses and each policy statement with the BOP policy. We also gathered financial data showing that TDC receives federal funding. It is a violation of federal Law for a state to accept federal funds and discriminate on the basis of race, sex, color, religion, handicap, etc. We gathered letters and program guides from South Dakota and other state prisons who allow powwows, and BOP policy allowing seasonal powwows, colored headbands, personal pipes for pipeholders etc. We had many published documents showing our way is to celebrate based on the lunar cycle and feast for the four seasons. We had over a dozen affidavits from the spiritual leaders, other prisons, etc.
My lawsuit also covers official retaliation against me for the filing this suit and grievances related to it. We had evidence of the past retaliation against me, evidence of a long continuous history by TDC to be hostile against Pro Se litigants, and recent Internet accounts from inmates in TDC especially at the Polansky Unit where I am located now sharing religious discrimination against Native Americans and a wave of brutality.
We compiled a PHOTOGRAPHIC PORTFOLIO with seven pages and nine photos of me from 1992 to 2006 with short hair, long hair, front view, side views, full length, with and without glasses, and a beard, every conceivable way I could change my appearance…so TDC could not claim it would be unable to identify me when I grew my hair long.
I do not trust ACLU or any other lawyers because the have their own agenda so I represented myself. Nevertheless, I contacted the BECKET FUND FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, and asked for their help…to file an AMICUS Brief because they have handled more RLUIPA cases with success than any other agency. They refused to even respond or return an email. It appears that the Becket Fund assists only Judeo-Christian faiths or those who make sizable donations to their fund.
I am asking everyone to email or call the Becket Fund and make a complaint and urge them to assist me or explain why they will not (http://www.becket-fund.org , (202) 955-0095).
Thunderhorse vs. Pierce was scheduled for a BENCH TRIAL at the federal Courthouse in TYLER, TX on 2/28/06 at 10 A.M.. Little Owl and I gathered all our evidence (over 100 exhibits) and 25 witnesses, but ten days before trial Judge Guthrie cancelled the Trial and dismissed the case in the favor or te State. This was contrary to its own ORDER of 12/29/05.
I filed a NOTICE if APPEAL and the case is not in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. I submitted my Brief, and the State now has 30 days to respond and once they file I will have 10 days for a reply Brief. I filed a Motion to Expand The Record so the Court can see all the evidence I had ready. A dismissal for summary judgement is not proper if there is evidence that support the claims and in this case the evidence is overwhelming. So we are hopeful the Court will REVERSE and REMAND for the bench trial we had scheduled.
I also filed a Complaint for Judicial misconduct against Guthrie for her abuses of discretion and prejudice. If all ths legal redress fails we are not giving up. So stay with us for further details.
Kutchimmoke (Be of Good Cheer)
Biwabiko Paddaquahas (Iron Thunderhorse)